Timofei Derepasko vs Ivan Marrero Curbelo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Nov at 10:39 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Derepasko vs I. Marrero Curbelo

RUS
0
Win
Played
1
Win

ESP
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Derepasko 0 - 1 Curbelo
They have played 3 sets in total, with Timofei Derepasko winning 1 and Ivan Marrero Curbelo winning 2. The last match between Ivan Marrero Curbelo and Timofei Derepasko was at the M25 Manama, 14-11-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 5-7 7-5 7-6(5).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Derepasko | 0 |
| Curbelo | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M25 Manama(11-14-25)
T. Derepasko vs I. M. Curbelo H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 54.76% (23-19) | Career Total W/L | 55.47% (218-175) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 1 | Titles | 2 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Derepasko vs I. M. Curbelo Match Preview:
- On second serve points, Timofei Derepasko has a slight edge, winning 40.92% compared to Ivan Marrero Curbelo's 40.66% over the past six months. How much does this edge matter? It can be crucial in tight matches.
- Ivan Marrero Curbelo has superior return stats, claiming 49.12% of points on opponents' second serves, whereas Derepasko manages 47.87%. In first serve returns, Ivan outperforms avec 34.86% over Derepasko's 27.72%.
- Both players exhibit resilience under pressure. Marrero Curbelo saves 53.09% of breakpoints, slightly outperforming Derepasko's 51.61%.
- In terms of match wins, Derepasko has a slight annual edge, winning 64.52% of his matches (20/11), surpassing Marrero Curbelo's 59.65% (34/23).
- Derepasko's best surface is indoor hard (75% win rate), but his clay court performance drops significantly to 36%. Marrero Curbelo shares a similar strength on hard courts (75% win rate), but shows more consistency on clay with a 50% winning percentage.
- At the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, Marrero Curbelo displays a marginally better yearly performance with a 65.31% win rate compared to Derepasko's 64.52%.
- Derepasko has faced stronger competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 122.58, compared to Marrero Curbelo's 356.37, providing him a slight competitive edge.
- In deciding sets, Derepasko proves superior, winning 67% compared to Marrero Curbelo's 39%.
- Marrero Curbelo excels in converting breakpoints, operating at 42.16% compared to Derepasko's 31.06%, a critical component for match-turning moments.
Editorial Prediction (November 14, 2025, UTC):
As we compare the players, Ivan Marrero Curbelo appears to have a more effective return game, particularly on first serve returns, which could pressure Derepasko's serves throughout the match.
However, Timofei Derepasko exhibits resilience in decisive moments, winning a higher percentage of deciding sets and facing tougher competition overall. His performance in these situations may provide him an edge when the match gets tight.
Considering the variables, Derepasko's better experience against higher-ranked opponents and his superior deciding set performance suggest he holds a slight advantage in this encounter. Thus, Timofei Derepasko is the likely winner of the upcoming tennis match.
Timofei Derepasko vs Ivan Marrero Curbelo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Derepasko vs I. M. Curbelo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 18 | Games Won | 19 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 3:25:22 | Average Match Time | 3:25:22 |
| 40% (45/112) | 1st Serve % | 75% (86/115) |
| 78% (35/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (56/86) |
| 48% (32/67) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (16/29) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 80% (4/5) |
| 37% (43/115) | Return Points Win % | 40% (45/112) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Derepasko Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 5-7 7-5 7-6(5) | ||
R2 | W | 7-6(6) 6-0 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 2-0 ret. | ||
R2 | L | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-0 6-0 | ||
I. M. Curbelo Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | W | 5-7 7-5 7-6(5) | ||
R2 | W | 7-6(5) 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
SF | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
QF | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||

T. Derepasko vs I. M. Curbelo Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.76% (23/19) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.47% (218/175) |
| 52.63% (50/45) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.00% (499/392) |
| 50.83% (457/442) | Games Win/Loss | 53.03% (4290/3799) |
| 59.26% (16/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.21% (135/93) |
| 36.36% (4/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.32% (79/78) |
| 75.00% (3/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (4/4) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 143 | Aces Total | 138 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 88 | Total Double Faults | 700 |
| 1:43:14 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 419.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 316.44 |
| 56% (1441/2561) | 1st Serve % | 66% (9408/14216) |
| 68% (982/1441) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (5746/9408) |
| 46% (517/1120) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2307/4808) |
| 46% (130/285) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (735/1598) |
| 43% (1128/2636) | Return Points Win % | 43% (6083/14091) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 25.93% (7/20) |
| 54.76% (23/19) | Futures W/L | 57.65% (211/155) |
| 54% (22/41) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (214/385) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 50% (4/8) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (37/81) |
| 58% (7/12) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (43/107) |
| 85% (26/22) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (235/197) |
| 15% (26/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (235/38) |
| 6% (16/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (158/21) |